palantir.com

https://www.palantir.com/

Ranks Overall #1,125 Big Tech #5

Data from Oct 8, 2026, 10:11 AM UTC 5d old, older than this category's 3 days freshness target Measured every 2 days · 19 runs since Aug 28, 2026

Elsewhere: PageSpeed Insights · Calibre · Treo · CrUX Vis · Tame the Bots · Scoring Calculator · Wayback Machine

This data is 5d old.

Sites are measured on a rolling schedule, so figures here are the newest successful measurement rather than a reading taken just now. Comparisons against other sites may span different points in time.

Lab data is measured using Lighthouse, Mobile mode unless otherwise specified. Field data is reported from Chrome UX Report (using p75 measurements).

Stack

Built with Next.js

Uses React

Hosted by Amazon S3

Filmstrip LAB Throttled

How the page drew during the measured load, at 8 points across 13.63 s. Compare this filmstrip against another site.

1.70 s
3.41 s
5.11 s
6.81 s
8.52 s
10.22 s
11.32 s
13.63 s

Lighthouse Scores LAB Simulated

Performance

↑ +10 (+21.3%)

Accessibility

no change

Best Practices

no change

SEO

no change

Metrics LAB FIELD

Core Web Vitals: failing 3 of 3 assessed from real Chrome users.

Field figures are the p75 across real Chrome users over a 28-day trailing window (2026-09-09 → 2026-10-06), url-level.

Metric	Lab Simulated	Field
LCP CWV Largest Contentful Paint	95.73 s poor	↓ -1895 ms (-1.9%) 28.62 s – 100.92 s	3.11 s needs work	65.8% 17.5% 16.7%
INP CWV Interaction to Next Paint — field only, no lab run can measure it	n/a	—	340 ms needs work	66.5% 13.4% 20%
CLS CWV Cumulative Layout Shift	0.064 good	↑ +0.064 0 – 0.064	0.110 needs work	45.1% 47.1% 7.8%
TBT Total Blocking Time	338 ms needs work	↓ -390 ms (-53.6%) significant 299 ms – 1.26 s	n/a	—
FCP First Contentful Paint	1.89 s needs work	↓ -318 ms (-14.4%) significant 1.88 s – 2.21 s	2.76 s needs work	58.1% 19.4% 22.6%
Speed Index	8.31 s poor	↓ -414 ms (-4.7%) 7.51 s – 20.06 s	n/a	—
TTFB Time to First Byte	609 ms good	→ no change 603 ms – 620 ms	626 ms good	80.4% 10.9% 8.7%

Metric

Lab Simulated

Field

Value

Change / range

Trend

p75

Distribution

LCP CWV Largest Contentful Paint

95.73 s poor

↓ -1895 ms (-1.9%) 28.62 s – 100.92 s

3.11 s needs work

65.8% 17.5% 16.7%

INP CWV Interaction to Next Paint — field only, no lab run can measure it

n/a

—

340 ms needs work

66.5% 13.4% 20%

CLS CWV Cumulative Layout Shift

0.064 good

↑ +0.064 0 – 0.064

0.110 needs work

45.1% 47.1% 7.8%

TBT Total Blocking Time

338 ms needs work

↓ -390 ms (-53.6%) significant 299 ms – 1.26 s

n/a

—

FCP First Contentful Paint

1.89 s needs work

↓ -318 ms (-14.4%) significant 1.88 s – 2.21 s

2.76 s needs work

58.1% 19.4% 22.6%

Speed Index

8.31 s poor

↓ -414 ms (-4.7%) 7.51 s – 20.06 s

n/a

—

TTFB Time to First Byte

609 ms good

→ no change 603 ms – 620 ms

626 ms good

80.4% 10.9% 8.7%

LCP Subparts LAB Throttled

The subparts attribute LCP to your server, resource discovery, download, or rendering. They come from one throttled load, the same one as the filmstrip, so they add up to that load’s LCP rather than the simulated Lab LCP above.

element render delay 10.75 s

time to first byte 573 ms

LCP LAB Simulated vs LCP FIELD

Lab 95.73 s

Field p75 3.11 s

The lab LCP is 30.76× the field p75 — real users likely have above-average hardware or network connectivity.

Page weight

Metric	Value	Change / range
Page Weight	40.76 MB	↓ -12245.3 kB (-23.5%) significant 34.38 MB – 230.92 MB
Requests	81	↑ +2 (+2.5%) 79 – 93
Third-party Weight	13.31 MB	↓ -1.6 kB 13.29 MB – 14.71 MB
Third-party CPU	84 ms	↓ -38 ms (-31.2%) significant 65 ms – 208 ms
Unused JS	973 kB	↑ +908 B (+0.1%) 944 kB – 973 kB
Unused CSS	118 kB	↓ -62 B (-0.1%) 117 kB – 118 kB

Metric

Value

Change / range

Trend

Page Weight

40.76 MB

↓ -12245.3 kB (-23.5%) significant 34.38 MB – 230.92 MB

Requests

↑ +2 (+2.5%) 79 – 93

Third-party Weight

13.31 MB

↓ -1.6 kB 13.29 MB – 14.71 MB

Third-party CPU

84 ms

↓ -38 ms (-31.2%) significant 65 ms – 208 ms

Unused JS

973 kB

↑ +908 B (+0.1%) 944 kB – 973 kB

Unused CSS

118 kB

↓ -62 B (-0.1%) 117 kB – 118 kB

By resource type

Type	Share	Size	Requests
image	79.2%	32.28 MB	14
media	15.6%	6.37 MB	2
script	3.9%	1.61 MB	33
other	0.4%	176 kB	21
font	0.3%	140 kB	3
stylesheet	0.3%	127 kB	6
document	0.2%	62.8 kB	1
Total		40.76 MB	81

Third parties 3 entities

Entity	Transfer	Size	Main thread Simulated
ctfassets.net	image	12.89 MB	0 ms
Optanon		245 kB	44 ms
Google Tag Manager		173 kB	39 ms
Total		13.31 MB	84 ms

Entity

Transfer

Size

Main thread Simulated

ctfassets.net

image

12.89 MB

0 ms

Optanon

245 kB

44 ms

Google Tag Manager

173 kB

39 ms

Total

13.31 MB

84 ms

Without JavaScript

This page is client rendered.

Nothing was painted until the scripts ran. This is a web performance and robustness issue!

The same load, photographed twice at 412×823: once with scripts disabled, once as rendered.

62.7% of pixels differ — the page changes substantially. A shifted layout counts as difference, so a <noscript> banner alone can account for a large figure.

Page health

Metric	Value	Change / range
Main Thread Work	2.92 s	↓ -1878 ms (-39.1%) significant 2.92 s – 9.43 s
Long Tasks	10	↓ -3 (-23.1%) significant 10 – 20
DOM Elements	1,461	↓ -21 (-1.4%) 1,461 – 1,491
Axe Violations Violating nodes from a full Axe CLI run (more than Lighthouse reports)	5	→ no change 5 – 208
A11y Failures	2	→ no change 2 – 4
A11y Failing Nodes	3	→ no change 3 – 122

Metric

Value

Change / range

Trend

Main Thread Work

2.92 s

↓ -1878 ms (-39.1%) significant 2.92 s – 9.43 s

Long Tasks

↓ -3 (-23.1%) significant 10 – 20

DOM Elements

1,461

↓ -21 (-1.4%) 1,461 – 1,491

Axe Violations Violating nodes from a full Axe CLI run (more than Lighthouse reports)

→ no change 5 – 208

A11y Failures

→ no change 2 – 4

A11y Failing Nodes

→ no change 3 – 122

Main thread work

Task	Share	Duration Simulated
script evaluation	38%	1.10 s
other	30%	862 ms
script parse compile	18%	523 ms
style layout	9%	264 ms
paint composite render	2%	72 ms
parse HTML	2%	67 ms
garbage collection	1%	33 ms
Total		2.92 s

Task

Time

Duration Simulated

script evaluation

38%

1.10 s

other

30%

862 ms

script parse compile

18%

523 ms

style layout

264 ms

paint composite render

72 ms

parse HTML

67 ms

garbage collection

33 ms

Total

2.92 s

Axe violations axe-core 4.13.0, full rule set

5 violating nodes across 3 rules, 2062 passing. This is a standalone Axe CLI run and is stricter than the subset Lighthouse already includes.

moderate region — All page content should be contained by landmarks 3 nodes

Offending elements

.ptcom-design__announcementBarTextCell__1ulabpz

<div class="ptcom-design__announcementBarTextCell__1ulabpz"><div><p>Read CEO Alex Karp’s <a href="/q2-2026-letter">Letter to Shareholders</a> </p></div></div>

.ptcom-design__skipnav__1g4b6dk

<a href="#main" class="ptcom-design__skipnav__1g4b6dk">Skip to Content</a>

.ptcom-design__primaryButtonWrapper__1g4b6dk

<div class="ptcom-design__primaryButtonWrapper__1g4b6dk"><a class="ptcom-design__button__1d8xeyx" aria-controls="drawer"><span aria-hidden="true" class="ptcom-design__glyphLeft__1d8xeyx">↖</span> Get…

critical aria-valid-attr-value — ARIA attributes must conform to valid values 1 node

Offending element

.ptcom-design__button__1d8xeyx

<a class="ptcom-design__button__1d8xeyx" aria-controls="drawer"><span aria-hidden="true" class="ptcom-design__glyphLeft__1d8xeyx">↖</span> Get Started</a>

serious scrollable-region-focusable — Scrollable region must have keyboard access 1 node
Offending element
1. .ptcom-design__cards__1xz2rij
```
<div class="ptcom-design__cards__1xz2rij" style="--rotation-duration: 324s;">
```

Accessibility failures 2 of 29 audits

label-content-name-mismatch — Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. 2 nodes
aria-valid-attr-value — `[aria-*]` attributes do not have valid values 1 node

Best Practices failures 3 of 18 audits

errors-in-console — Browser errors were logged to the console 4 items
inspector-issues — Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 1 item
valid-source-maps — Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript 2 items

SEO failures 2 of 10 audits

link-text — Links do not have descriptive text 2 items
crawlable-anchors — Links are not crawlable 1 item

Hygiene

HTTPS HSTS CSP Clickjacking protection Origin isolation Trusted Types bfcache h2 4 console errors

Measurement log

Field history 25 weeks

Weekly p75 from the CrUX History API, backfilled in a single request.

Week ending	LCP	INP	CLS	FCP	TTFB
2026-10-03	3.16 s	397 ms	0.110	2.81 s	640 ms
2026-09-26	3.18 s	469 ms	0.110	2.83 s	653 ms
2026-09-19	3.17 s	509 ms	0.110	2.86 s	659 ms
2026-09-12	3.17 s	486 ms	0.110	2.87 s	648 ms
2026-09-05	3.14 s	446 ms	0.100	2.86 s	637 ms
2026-08-29	3.03 s	400 ms	0.030	2.71 s	598 ms
2026-08-22	3.03 s	396 ms	0.010	2.70 s	588 ms
2026-08-15	3.04 s	408 ms	0.010	2.70 s	586 ms
2026-08-08	3.03 s	407 ms	0.010	2.65 s	574 ms
2026-08-01	3.09 s	438 ms	0.010	2.74 s	585 ms
2026-07-25	3.08 s	431 ms	0.010	2.73 s	586 ms
2026-07-18	3.01 s	423 ms	0.010	2.68 s	581 ms

Week ending

LCP

INP

CLS

FCP

TTFB

2026-10-03

3.16 s

397 ms

0.110

2.81 s

640 ms

2026-09-26

3.18 s

469 ms

0.110

2.83 s

653 ms

2026-09-19

3.17 s

509 ms

0.110

2.86 s

659 ms

2026-09-12

3.17 s

486 ms

0.110

2.87 s

648 ms

2026-09-05

3.14 s

446 ms

0.100

2.86 s

637 ms

2026-08-29

3.03 s

400 ms

0.030

2.71 s

598 ms

2026-08-22

3.03 s

396 ms

0.010

2.70 s

588 ms

2026-08-15

3.04 s

408 ms

0.010

2.70 s

586 ms

2026-08-08

3.03 s

407 ms

0.010

2.65 s

574 ms

2026-08-01

3.09 s

438 ms

0.010

2.74 s

585 ms

2026-07-25

3.08 s

431 ms

0.010

2.73 s

586 ms

2026-07-18

3.01 s

423 ms

0.010

2.68 s

581 ms

Runs

Every stored run for this URL, newest first.

When	Perf	LCP	CLS	TBT	Weight	Runs	Spread	Bench	Took	Archive
Oct 8, 2026, 10:11 AM UTC	57	95.73 s	0.064	338 ms	40.76 MB	3/3	±4	2,968 +19%	89.3s	Wayback
Oct 6, 2026, 5:11 AM UTC	47	97.62 s	0	728 ms	53.30 MB	3/3	±1	2,472 -1%	145s	Wayback
Oct 1, 2026, 7:09 AM UTC	47	96.19 s	0.064	690 ms	56.44 MB	3/3	±4	2,245 -10%	152.9s	Wayback
Sep 29, 2026, 4:41 AM UTC	47	96.50 s	0.064	682 ms	56.45 MB	3/3	±1	2,498 0%	145.3s	Wayback
Sep 25, 2026, 8:24 PM UTC	49	96.63 s	0.064	581 ms	53.30 MB	3/3	±1	2,302 -7%	143.7s	Wayback
Sep 23, 2026, 11:11 AM UTC	56	28.62 s	0.064	299 ms	56.44 MB	3/3	±3	3,404 +37%	144.6s	Wayback
Sep 21, 2026, 8:02 AM UTC	50	96.20 s	0.064	595 ms	34.38 MB	3/3	±1	2,476 0%	105.4s	Wayback
Sep 18, 2026, 11:14 PM UTC	51	96.26 s	0.064	541 ms	34.38 MB	3/3	±2	2,250 -10%	95.7s	Wayback
Sep 16, 2026, 6:48 PM UTC	43	97.19 s	0.064	774 ms	218.81 MB	3/3	±1	3,049 +23%	184.1s	Wayback
Sep 14, 2026, 5:59 PM UTC	40	96.99 s	0.064	1.09 s	217.51 MB	3/3	±2	2,500 +1%	198.2s	Wayback
Sep 12, 2026, 7:10 AM UTC	39	96.85 s	0.064	1.16 s	219.00 MB	3/3	±2	2,336 -6%	196.6s	Wayback
Sep 10, 2026, 5:38 AM UTC	39	96.94 s	0.064	1.22 s	223.45 MB	3/3	±7	2,325 -7%	141.2s	Wayback
Sep 8, 2026, 12:58 AM UTC	39	96.88 s	0.064	1.10 s	202.95 MB	3/3	±2	2,475 -1%	134.7s	Wayback
Sep 6, 2026, 12:36 AM UTC	38	96.86 s	0.064	1.21 s	219.08 MB	3/3	±5	2,280 -8%	135.4s	Wayback
Sep 4, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC	40	100.76 s	0.064	983 ms	230.92 MB	3/3	±6	2,286 -8%	136.6s	Wayback
Sep 3, 2026, 7:02 AM UTC	39	100.54 s	0.001	1.16 s	222.81 MB	3/3	±1	2,477 0%	139.3s	Wayback
Sep 2, 2026, 3:12 AM UTC	39	100.46 s	0.064	1.26 s	225.62 MB	3/3	±2	2,212 -11%	135.7s	Wayback
Aug 31, 2026, 10:36 PM UTC	39	100.92 s	0.064	1.14 s	229.17 MB	3/3	±2	2,248 -10%	137s	Wayback
Aug 28, 2026, 5:33 PM UTC	40	100.90 s	0.064	1.05 s	202.14 MB	3/3	±1	2,656 +7%	134.8s	Wayback

When

Scores

Perf

LCP

CLS

TBT

Weight

Runs

Spread

Bench

Took

Stack

Filmstrip LAB 🐢 Throttled

Lighthouse Scores LAB 🤖 Simulated

Metrics LAB FIELD

LCP Subparts LAB 🐢 Throttled

LCP LAB 🤖 Simulated vs LCP FIELD

Page weight

By resource type

Third parties 3 entities

Without JavaScript

Page health

Main thread work

Axe violations axe-core 4.13.0, full rule set

Accessibility failures 2 of 29 audits

Best Practices failures 3 of 18 audits

SEO failures 2 of 10 audits

Hygiene

Measurement log

Field history 25 weeks

Runs

Filmstrip LAB Throttled

Lighthouse Scores LAB Simulated

LCP Subparts LAB Throttled

LCP LAB Simulated vs LCP FIELD