speedlify2

Lighthouse lab metrics and Chrome UX Report field data for a list of sites, recorded on every run and compared over time — measured continuously.

Measurement runs · Embed a score ·

pypi.org

https://pypi.org/

65 96 96 100 AXE CWV

Data from Aug 25, 2026, 4:37 PM UTC 13h old

Overall #1,261 Package Managers #8 · 1 measurement · since Aug 25, 2026

Core Web Vitals field data, url-level

Real Chrome users, 28-day window (2026-07-27 → 2026-08-23). This is what Google measures you on.

LCP 1.73 s good
INP 126 ms good
CLS 0 good

Scores

65
Performance
no change
96
Accessibility
no change
96
Best Practices
no change
100
SEO
no change

Lab metrics Lighthouse, mobile

Metric Current Previous Change Best Worst Trend
LCP Largest Contentful Paint 4.28 s 4.28 s 4.28 s
CLS Cumulative Layout Shift 0.331 0.331 0.331
TBT Total Blocking Time 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms
FCP First Contentful Paint 2.70 s 2.70 s 2.70 s
Speed Index 2.70 s 2.70 s 2.70 s
TTFB Time to First Byte 603 ms 603 ms 603 ms

What LCP is made of observed, unthrottled

A flat LCP number tells you something regressed. The subparts tell you whether it was the server, resource discovery, the download, or rendering.

Measured on the trace before throttling is modelled, so these are real durations that will not sum to the 4.28 s above — that figure is a simulation of the same load on a slow phone and connection. Read these for the proportions: which phase dominates.

element render delay 87 ms
time to first byte 19 ms

Field data Chrome UX Report, url-level

Real Chrome users, 28-day trailing window (2026-07-27 → 2026-08-23). This is what Google measures you on.

Metric p75 Rating Distribution (good / needs work / poor)
LCP CWV 1.73 s good 86.3% good
INP CWV Interaction to Next Paint — field only, Lighthouse cannot measure this in a lab run 126 ms good 86.4% good
CLS CWV 0 good 95.1% good
FCP 1.74 s good 75.9% good
TTFB 904 ms needs-improvement 71.4% good

Lab vs field

Lab LCP 4.28 s · field p75 1.73 s · real users are 0.4× faster than the lab.

Field history 25 weeks

Weekly p75 from the CrUX History API, backfilled in a single request.

Week ending LCPINPCLSFCPTTFB
2026-08-22 1.74 s 126 ms 0 1.75 s 912 ms
2026-08-15 1.84 s 127 ms 0 1.86 s 982 ms
2026-08-08 1.83 s 125 ms 0 1.85 s 979 ms
2026-08-01 1.80 s 121 ms 0 1.82 s 972 ms
2026-07-25 1.68 s 118 ms 0 1.71 s 909 ms
2026-07-18 1.42 s 114 ms 0 1.45 s 749 ms
2026-07-11 1.36 s 113 ms 0 1.38 s 681 ms
2026-07-04 1.37 s 112 ms 0 1.39 s 675 ms
2026-06-27 1.30 s 105 ms 0 1.32 s 642 ms
2026-06-20 1.34 s 104 ms 0 1.35 s 665 ms
2026-06-13 1.36 s 103 ms 0 1.37 s 685 ms
2026-06-06 1.41 s 104 ms 0 1.42 s 719 ms

Page weight

Metric Current Previous Change Best Worst Trend
Page Weight 576 kB 576 kB 576 kB
Requests 21 21 21
Third-party Weight 13.3 kB 13.3 kB 13.3 kB
Third-party CPU 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms
Unused JS 68.7 kB 68.7 kB 68.7 kB
Unused CSS 192 kB 192 kB 192 kB

By resource type

stylesheet 204 kB · 3 req
font 183 kB · 6 req
script 121 kB · 4 req
image 53.9 kB · 2 req
other 7.9 kB · 5 req
document 7.0 kB · 1 req
third party 13.3 kB · 4 req

Third parties 3 entities

13.3 kB transferred, 6 ms of main thread time. This is the number most likely to regress without anyone on your team shipping anything.

ethicalads.io 9.0 kB · 3 ms CPU
python.org 3.0 kB · 3 ms CPU
Statuspage 1.2 kB · 0 ms CPU

Page health

Metric Current Previous Change Best Worst Trend
Main Thread Work 536 ms 536 ms 536 ms
Long Tasks 2 2 2
DOM Elements 215 215 215
Axe Violations Violating nodes from a full axe run — stricter than Lighthouse's subset 14 14 14
A11y Failures 1 1 1
A11y Failing Nodes 15 15 15

Main thread work

style layout 168 ms
other 158 ms
script evaluation 146 ms
script parse compile 26 ms
parse HTML 19 ms
paint composite render 18 ms

Axe violations axe-core 4.13.0, full rule set

14 violating nodes across 1 rule, 448 passing. This is a standalone axe run, stricter than the subset Lighthouse folds into its score above — and it is the second tiebreaker in the ranking.

  • moderate region — All page content should be contained by landmarks 14 nodes

Accessibility failures 1 of 29 audits

Tracked as a count, not just the score — the weighted score is coarse enough that you can ship a broken component and barely move it.

  • target-size — Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing. 15 nodes

Hygiene

Changes rarely — which is exactly why a change is worth noticing.

HTTPS HSTS CSP Clickjacking protection Origin isolation Trusted Types bfcache h2 1 console error

Measurement log

Every stored run for this URL, newest first. Failures are kept as records — "this site was down on Tuesday" is data too.

When PerfLCPCLSTBTWeight RunsSpreadBenchTook
Aug 25, 2026, 4:37 PM UTC 65 4.28 s 0.331 20 ms 576 kB 3/3 ±6 2,506 51.7s

Embed this score

Live below, then the markup that produces it. Drop that on any page to show pypi.org's scores, updated whenever this instance re-measures — more about the component. Don’t forget to bundle the speedlify2-score.js component code into your site!

<speedlify2-score speedlify-url="https://www.speedlify.dev/" url="https://pypi.org/"></speedlify2-score>